The following link contains a record prepared by the DRA, plus commentary and views  from Purdon Planning.

Approximately 83 people attended a public meeting convened by the Deakin Residents Association (DRA) held at the Canberra Bridge Club on 16 August 2017.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss two proposed developments in Deakin –

  • redevelopment of the St Luke’s church site in Newdegate Street (Block 1 Section 30 Deakin) and
  • redevelopment of the art gallery site bordering Hopetoun Circuit and Grey Street (Block13 Section 49 Deakin).

Proponents of the proposed developments addressed the meeting and comments and questions followed from the floor.

A questionnaire was circulated to each participant inviting written comments on the proposals, as well as views on the need for more integrated planning of development in Deakin.

A record of the meeting is at  RECORD OF DRA PUBLIC MEETING held 16 August 2107

Landscapes uncluttered with advertisements used to be one of Canberra’s
defining attributes. In recent years ugly signs have proliferated, and are getting
bigger. With this proposal there would be even more of them.
One of the most striking impacts of crossing the border into Queanbeyan is the
sudden appearance of bigger signs. Proposals to allow billboards will bring
Queanbeyan visual pollution to Canberra.
Current regulations on sign size are not enforced. There are already billboards
outside the Deakin shops advertising pizzas, and outside the National Zoo to
name two. Fyshwick and Philip are becoming an unregulated free for all.
Poles that were placed on Kings and Commonwealth Avenues to enable flags to
be flown for visiting heads of state are now used as fluttering billboards to
advertise everything from dog shows to exhibitions at the national institutions.
Canberra airport has been a law unto itself, and is a foretaste of the size of the
massive billboards that could follow a relaxation of current (unreinforced)
There are already too many road signs. Parking signs proliferate. Why not do
away with most urban parking signs and use procedures in the other local
government jurisdictions and in the ANU. Red paint on the gutter – no stopping; a
double yellow line – no parking; single yellow line – one or two hour parking; and a
dashed line longer parking.
Within 100 m of Hopetoun Circuit roundabout there are 20 signs, including a ‘billboard’
advertising Calthorpe’s House. Some seek to control speeds from 50 to 60
and a 40 km/h zone which is 75 m long. Drivers have enough distractions.
No more bigger signs.
George Wilson
Deakin Residents Association
Ph 62812160

The shortage of parking at the Equinox Building  is causing overflows of 50 – 100 cars into the adjacent former bowling club site  and nearby residential streets.

Current proposal to develop the former bowling club site as Equinox 2 will likely see additional parking shortages.

Redevelopment of the Telstra building in Kent Street and St Luke’s Church Newdegate Street will add additional pressure and increase traffic.

DRA is concerned that ACT Government does not see these new developments as creating a parking shortage problem and traffic  – but rather, a mechanism to discourage car use. See correspondence with officials which follows :

  • “I understand your concern, but our parking policies are designed to balance provision of private vehicle parking with encouraging modal shift towards more sustainable transport modes rather than single-driver-private-car. We do not support providing a dedicated car park (free or at-cost) for every person who may wish to drive to an employment node.”
  • “There is no government policy that would provide more taxpayer funded free parking in a central area such as West Deakin with existing high levels of service and accessibility for public transport and active travel (walking and cycling) – and nor would I advise a government to adopt such a policy.”

DRA understands that free car parking will be removed in the Geils Court and other West Deakin car parks and that pay parking will be reintroduced notwithstanding that it proved so undesirable in early 2016.

Parking was restricted in Beauchamp St on a trial basis for 12 months after limited public consultation of potentially affected residents in the area. It seems likely, the Government will introduce more parking restrictions wherever overflows exist, thereby changing the nature of our residential streets.  This could affect any street within walking distance (ie several hundred metres) of the West Deakin offices, Deakin shops, or busy locations – which is most of Deakin.  This would convert most of Deakin into a no-parking, or 2-hour only zone so that residents will lose the ability to park all day outside their own homes. It wil fill the suburb with ugly signs.


DRA believes there is a needs for a parking and traffic strategy that considers proposed developments and needs of residents.

The meeting on 16th considered proposals by

  • the Anglican church for eight ‘supportive housing’ units on St Luke’s Church site, Newdegate Street (Block 1 Section 30 Deakin)
  • Provectus  for a 90 bed residential aged care accommodation, 12 assisted living units, plus 40 seniors respite places on the Art Gallery site, 38 Grey Street (Block 13 Section 49  Deakin) 

The meeting was attended by 83 people. Most were Deakin residents.

In general, there was  support for the St Luke’s development, although there were concerns about the possible sub lease arrangements.

On the other hand, there was angst about the Grey Street development. Questions were asked about increased traffic, pedestrian safety, off site parking, underestimation of parking impact, increased noise (especially for those in the Ambassador apartments), building design, local shadowing, over-scale and inappropriate development for the site.

Resolving traffic, parking and congestion issues are key requirements for progressing the Provectus proposal. Quality data and professional credible modelling are the foundation of solutions.
A questionaire circulated at the meeting proposed that individual proposals in the suburb should not to be considered in isolation but be part of a strategic assessment that integrated with other developments. There was strong support that the accumulated impact should be assessed of the Anglican and Provectus developments and those by the Federal Golf Club, the Telstra site on Kent St, Equinox_2, light rail park and ride and overflow parking from West Deakin offices and Parliament.


Follow this link to see answers (dated 28 July) from Purdon Planning to questions about the planned Grey Street site/Provectus development.

For more information: 0427975500.


The ACT Government  is facilitating a ‘community panel’ to engage with the Federal Golf Club and their developer in relation to proposed future development of part of the Federal Golf course for retirement housing. They are inviting a range of organisations to participate in the community panel, including ISCCC, Red Hill Regenerators, Hughes/Garran residents groups, Deakin Residents Association, and Conservation Council. The first meeting was on 3 August 2017 6.30-8.30pm and second meeting 15 August 6.30-8.30pm at the Club, Gowrie Drive, Red Hill. Members interested in the proposal might like to participate. More information on the proposal is at the link on DRA web site.


Proposed plan for housing development on Federal Golf Course, Red Hill

29 Jun / 2017

Deakin Has History

Under this topic we are collecting and presenting information on the history of the suburb of Deakin – its origins, its development, its residents.
If you are a long-time resident or have family connections to Deakin, or if you have any contribution or comment to make on the history of Deakin, please contact the coordinator of this section: Richard Thwaites.


The Deakin Residents’ Association (DRA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the National Capital Authority (NCA) Issues and Policy Response Paper, May 2017 relating to the Deakin/Forrest Residential Precinct

The objects and purposes of the DRA are ‘to enhance the residential, suburban, social and environmental qualities of Deakin, consistent with garden city planning principles’. A key focus for the DRA is retaining Deakin’s garden-suburb environment.

We note that the focus of the NCA paper relates to a relatively small number of residential properties ‘on the area generally bound by Canterbury Crescent, National Circuit, Hobart Avenue and blocks fronting State Circle’, although the area outlined in Figure 2 of the document shows blocks on State Circle itself are not included.

DRA agrees that this Paper represents an opportunity to determine whether current planning and design controls remain adequate to guide the future of this precinct and for consideration of policy responses to significant emerging and strategic issues in the zone. We understand that, had the proposals now foreshadowed in the NCA’s Paper been in force, some of the recent developments/redevelopments which have taken place, and which have been controversial, would not have been approved.

These comments are based largely on discussions at the NCA briefing provided on 27 April 2017, inspections by Committee members Helen Alnutt and Mary Baumgarten of relevant developments in the zone as identified in Fig 3, and developments in adjacent areas (Arthur Circ, Bougainville St/Empire Circ, Hotham Cres), and consultation with and feedback from local residents, particularly property owners in Canterbury Crescent.

DRA broadly supports the thrust of the strategic directions and proposals outlined in the Paper, as these are consistent with the objects and purposes of the DRA, subject to the comments provided below.

At the 27 April meeting, it was stated that the main changes relate to:

  • Plot building to planting ratio ;
  • Site coverage including driveways;
  • Amount and use of land available for soft landscaping.

Plot Building to Planting Ratio

DRA supports the NCA’s proposal to maintain the existing plot ratio that limits building on residential sites in the zone to a maximum of 0.4 (alongside a new 40% area of soft landscaping).

At the same time we note that one resident of the area, questioned whether the 0.4 plot ratio/40% soft planting limit was too restrictive, given the significant amount of public parkland already in the area, particularly around The Lodge and Parliament House and that current parking restrictions in, streets such as Canterbury Crescent, (no parking on one side and 2 hour parking on the other during weekdays) put pressure on residents to provide extra parking on their property. While generally supportive of the NCA’s position, the DRA suggests that any individual request for a minor variation to the 0.4 building/40% soft planting ratio could be considered on its merits.

Other residents felt that it was not the 0.4 plot ratio that was a problem but rather the number of dwellings on a block. These residents proposed that the current ratio should be maintained but be accompanied by a limit on the number of dwellings allowed to be established on a block. This would curtail motivation to remove trees to maximise development. An option for containing an unacceptable density in multi-unit developments is to require a ratio of (say) a maximum of one residential dwelling per 600sqm of land. This would serve to enhance the ‘Garden City’ concept of the precinct

Local residents also considered that amalgamations outside of what is allowed under Amendment 39 relating to State Circle should specifically be disallowed. This would deter the construction of ‘concrete jungle’ edifices, reducing the prestige of this historically significant area as well as adversely affecting amenity for neighbours and increasing traffic congestion, noise and parking.

Soft Landscaping

The NCA’s Paper makes a new proposal that not less than 40% of the block must be set aside for soft planting. We understand that is to deal with previously inexact language about soft planting requirements in the zone. This is a welcome new development.

The Paper also recommends and DRA supports a range of measures proposed by the NCA to strengthen the current landscape requirements of the Plan. Along with proposals for setting quantitative controls to provide certainty in respect of the extent of soft landscaping to be provided across a site, these include encouraging hedges in lieu of fences, and limiting the amount of hard surfaces to reduce stormwater run-off. Limitations would also be placed on the number of driveways.

DRA notes that increased flexibility for dual occupancy siting would also potentially increase significant planting opportunities. The narrow corridors between dual occupancy dwellings to provide separation can be wasted areas with overshadowing, insufficient space for significant plantings and privacy concerns. It is suggested a range of imaginative and creative proposals for dual occupancies be considered to maximise the area for and benefits of soft landscaping and options for canopy tress surrounds, to enhance the “Garden City” concept. The Paper proposes limitations to the number of driveways. It is suggested that two driveways be allowed only if needed for direct access to existing above ground garages.

While mandatory increased requirements on soft landscaping may aid preservation, it can add interest to consider different approaches, for example, the Japanese style pebble garden at 14 Melbourne Avenue.


Trees are a major focus of the Plan. The Paper proposes that large, established trees should be retained, that new trees, capable of reaching heights twice that of the proposed building should be provided as part of all proposed redevelopment proposals and each plot should have at least one canopy tree. It also proposes new and existing tree should cover 15% canopy coverage of a site within 10 years of development. This is consistent with the need to preserve essential green infrastructure in this zone close to the Lodge and Parliament.

We understand that where adverse impacts or safety concerns may arise in relation to existing or proposed trees, advice will be sought from suitably qualified arborists or horticulturalists. In DRA’s view it will be important for the NCA to ensure that such people provide genuine independent advice and are not merely sympathetic nominees of builders or developers. The NCA should also obtain photographic evidence of tree cover on the block before and after development with developer penalties for trees that should not have been removed.

DRA notes that street trees are an important are an important feature of the NCA precinct landscape. However, responsibility for them rests with the ACT Government rather than the NCA or individual landowners. This can result in inaction or neglect. For example, residents commented on some street trees in Canterbury Crescent which are severely deformed and where branches fall unexpectedly (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Deformed trees that need attention

DRA recommends that the NCA works closely with the ACT Government to repair or replace unsightly or dangerous trees. Canterbury Crescent is an important connecting street from Parliament House to the Lodge and often serves as a loop street for tourist buses.

One individual resident of the area considers that the provision of canopy trees should be at the discretion of individual landowners. This same resident recommended that the preferred location for canopy trees was on wide nature strips where roots and leaves do not interfere with buildings, pavements and utility services. However, the DRA believes the NCA’s proposal is laudable and consistent with the Garden City principles supported by DRA and that the outcome of the NCA proposals will be desirable on both aesthetic and environmental grounds.


DRA has some questions about compliance matters. While issues such as building height, setbacks and siting of buildings are easily quantified, others such as architectural appropriateness or status of soft landscaping and garden design are more subjective and less so. Who will decide on and monitor such things?

Performance Standards

The Paper states that quantitative standards are accompanied by performance standards and that compliance with quantitative standards will not necessarily result in Works Approval unless the performance standards have been met. This wording is very unclear and does not reference relevant standards. DRA notes that performance standards are spelt out in the NCA’s Design and Siting Code Design and Siting General Code but they need to be spelt out explicitly in the Paper to avoid ambiguity.

Diplomatic Missions

DRA understands that proposals outlined in the Paper do not apply to some Diplomatic Missions, particularly in the Somers Crescent area. It is unclear whether other Diplomatic Missions, for example the residence and chancery of Cambodia and the residence of the Myanmar Embassy on the opposite side of Melbourne Avenue, are similarly included.

DRA considers it important to spell out what restrictions, if any, do apply to the development of diplomatic premises in the NCA zone. DRA considers there should be in principle adherence to the same requirements as other similar structures in the zone. Exemptions should only be granted where the Diplomatic Missions can show that they are essential, such as for security reasons, or the need/wish for structures to reflect their national and international significance.

Advice on Proposed Developments/Redevelopments

Many residents expressed concern that they were largely unaware of proposed developments/redevelopments in the precinct area. This means that they are missing out on the opportunity to comment prior to any approval being granted. We understand the NCA is looking at this issue. One possibility would be for DRA and Forrest Residents Group to be advised of any proposals to allow them to then pass this information on to members/residents.

Wider Application

The NCA’s Paper states that many of the proposals outlined in it would be applicable to other parts of Canberra. DRA strongly agrees. There is no reason to suggest that, while technically the precinct ends at, for example National Circuit, such proposals should not be replicated in other parts of Deakin. Recent developments and proposed redevelopments in nearby parts of “Old Deakin”, for example 34 Melbourne Avenue, are a case in point.

Equally, many of the newer developing suburbs in Canberra, for example, West Belconnen, Tuggeranong and Molonglo, where there almost no trees and concrete pavements and lack of nature strips abound, could benefit from the application of these principles.

DRA believes it is regrettable that the Office of responsible ACT Minister, Mick Gentleman, has indicated the ACT Government will not be considering or taking up any proposals put forward in this Paper by the NCA, on the grounds that the ACT Government has “its own Plan”.

Submission to consultation on Light Rail Stage II – June 2017

The Deakin Residents’ Association (DRA) thanks Transport Canberra for the opportunity to consult on elements of Canberra Light Rail Stage 2.

The DRA has reservations about the adequacy of the consultation document. The DRA expresses the hope that this is only the first iteration of a process of consultation providing real input and allowing for realistic consideration of the Light Rail Stage 2.

Overall design issues

There are also local concerns about the project’s overall design. The DRA notes that expenditure on Stage 2 will be much higher than Stage I because of expensive bridge works across Parkes Way, wire-free transit through NCA zone, bridge reinforcement to cross the Lake, circumnavigating Parliament House or realigning National Circuit, lifts on Adelaide Avenue and many more high-cost pieces of infrastructure. These continuing concerns about overall design and the economics of the project are outlined in detail in the Attachment 1 and further issues raised at an ISCCC forum attended by DRA representatives and of relevance to Deakin are detailed in Attachment 2.

Delivery issues

If, however, Light Rail Stage 2 is to progress as planned there are specific Deakin-related concerns in relation to its delivery as follows:

  • Minimising the impact of light rail on environmental amenity;
  • Maximising the transportation options and benefits for Deakin residents;
  • Promoting active transport options from and through Deakin; and
  • Leveraging the infrastructure investments made in relation light rail to build a more connected local community.

Environmental Amenity

As an older inner suburb adjoining the Parliamentary Zone, Deakin is blessed with established trees and landscaping, purposefully designed vistas, and heritage streets and avenues.

The DRA maintains that any development in relation to light rail should be consistent with the heritage and environmental setting of Deakin.

This applies not only to the installation of light rail, and its ancillary infrastructure such as stations and alignment, but also any proposed development along the light rail corridor. The DRA opposes any development that would result in a loss of green park space for Deakin residents. This includes areas adjoining the Lodge, the Mint and the Mint Oval.

The vista from Yarra Glen to Parliament House is along a processional route of national significance. Any development along the Adelaide Avenue or Yarra Glen corridor, particularly resulting in densification of Deakin and surrounding suburbs, should be done in a way that does not compromise the vistas and complements the existing built environment.

The DRA urges Transport Canberra to respect the national processional status of Adelaide Avenue and to preserve the vistas. In particular, overhead powerlines for light rail should be avoided on Adelaide Avenue at least until the road continues on to Yarra Glen at Kent Street and ideally along the entire route.

Transportation Options

As a suburb, Deakin comprises a higher proportion of older residents (over 65) than almost any other ACT suburb, and also has a higher proportion of children than the average suburb. These groups are more likely to rely on public transport for their transportation needs.

Deakin is currently well served by a number of buses whose routes transverse through Deakin – Routes one, two and three. These buses travel to the City, ANU, University of Canberra and in the other direction, Woden and Canberra Hospital. They stop within 10 metres of the Deakin shops and provide easy access to John James Hospital. In addition, as part of the Governments re-election commitment a further bus route through Deakin to Russell and Canberra Airport has also been promised.

If the current bus service passing the Deakin shops was to be removed, requiring passengers to a walk to Adelaide Ave, transport services for Deakin residents and visitors would be significantly eroded.

Neither route proposed as part of the consultation provides a complete alternative to these bus routes. The DRA strongly recommends that these buses be maintained even after the light rail is operational.

The demographics of this area also necessitate appropriate access facilities to any light rail stations. The DRA proposes that lifts be installed from Hopetoun Circuit underpass level to the Adelaide Avenue level.

The DRA recommends that Transport Canberra maintains current bus routes through Deakin and installs lifts to light rail stations on Adelaide Avenue.

Active Transport and Light Rail Axillary Infrastructure

A key aim of the DRA is the promotion of active transport options for residents and commuters travelling through Deakin. Investments in signage, pedestrian crossings, shared paths and cycle-ways, limiting traffic/speeds and pedestrian safety infrastructure all contribute to encouraging active transport for leisure or as a commuting alternative.

To this end, the DRA has continued to pursue lower speed limits along Hopetoun Circuit, more pedestrian crossings to the Deakin shops, and safety improvements in crossing the Adelaide Avenue underpass and off-ramps. The proposed station on Hopetoun Circuit would be within walking distance of the Deakin shops.

While it is unclear at this stage what the Deakin station would look like, it would be a timely opportunity to consider significant improvements in the Deakin shops to Adelaide Avenue zone to make pedestrian access to the proposed station easy and safe.

The DRA recommends that Transport Canberra considers improvements to pedestrian and cycle infrastructure along the Deakin shops to Adelaide Avenue zone in determining the position and location of the Deakin Light Rail Station.

Route Options

We also note that stations at Kent St and Carruthers St are not close to the Deakin medical and office precincts. The proposed stops further down Adelaide Avenue and on Yarra Glen will require even longer walks to the medical and office precincts. We hoped the light rail would improve access to these important sites.

Further consideration could be given for the light rail to veer through Denison Street to service patients and visitors to Calvary John James Hospital, numerous other Medical Centres in West Deakin, the West Deakin Business Park, and Alfred Deakin High School. This option caters for some of the most vulnerable in our community and would help alleviate commuter overflow parking into Deakin. In addition, a connection between the West Deakin Medical precinct and Canberra Hospital in Garran would provide a logical transport link.

The DRA understands the benefits and limitations of alternative routes through the Parliament House or Barton precincts. Further detailed economic and social analysis is required before the route is selected, weighing up the increased patronage of clients accessing Barton, with the longer travel time that route would entail.

The DRA believes that the proposed route via Adelaide Avenue and Yarra Glen inadequately services the existing hospital/medical, business and community infrastructure in West Deakin and recommends the adoption of a new route via Denison Street. It also recommends a more detailed review of the proposed routes through either the Parliament House or Barton precincts



The alignment of the light rail should provide safe and quick access for passengers. Whether this is along the centre, verge or median is dependent on the station and access infrastructure proposed. As stated previously, the DRA is keen to be engaged in consultation about the development of station infrastructure to ensure it meets the local residents’ needs.

The DRA is keen to continue to engage with Transport Canberra on the siting and access to stations at Hopetoun Circuit and Kent St.


The DRA is grateful for the opportunity to express its views on Canberra Light Rail Stage 2. We are hopeful that all social and economic modelling constructed as part of the development of Stage 2 will be made public so the community can continue to have an informed discussion about the project, route, station locations and other aspects of light rail. We note the potential for light rail to bring benefits for residents living in south Canberra, and for Deakin residents in particular. We are confident that if the economic case is proven, and the Stage 2 Light Rail is designed appropriately and with community involvement, there will be benefit for residents into the future.

George Wilson
June 2017

Attachment 1

Continuing concerns about overall design

The following are a range of overall design concerns and questions about the planned Light Rail Stage 2.

  • The consultation document says 90,000 people will live or study within 1 km of the Woden corridor by 2041. What, exactly, is the “Woden corridor” because that figure seems to imply high-rise buildings on Adelaide Avenue which is currently flanked by embassies and a school?
  • Are the Curtin horse paddocks destined for high-rise accommodation?
  • What are the expected destinations for the commuters in this zone and how will light rail help?
  • What is the benefit for Civic to Woden passengers of light rail as their trip will be longer than existing express buses, and much longer if the Barton route or West Deakin option were to be adopted?
  • DRA notes that “a business case will be developed in 2017” and that “‘the Government will consider the business case at the end of 2017 or beginning of 2018”. When will the cost/benefit analysis and proposed final budget be made publicly available?

In view of likely very large cost of the project, the cost/benefit analysis should be thorough and realistic and the budget should be transparent. At the 10 May 2017 information day, when asked whether if there was a ceiling on costs, or an unacceptable cost/ benefit ratio that would preclude further work on light rail, presenters referred to ‘city building’ implying there was no limit to expenditure. It would be helpful to the community to quickly see detailed cost/benefit analysis and nomination of a planned ceiling for expenditure on this project.

  • At what point do the costs become unacceptable or unjustifiable, especially in comparison to spending the same money on emerging opportunities such as ride sharing, driverless cars, electric minibuses?

Attachment 2

The Inner South Canberra Community Council (ISCCC) held a public forum on Tuesday 9th May at which included a presentation from Duncan Edghill, Deputy Director General Transport Canberra.

Further issues raised in the Q&A and of direct relevance to Deakin residents are:

  • Are there plans for apartments on the strip of land between the Mint and Woden to increase the density, as on Northbourne Avenue?
  • What about an option 3 route around the Parliamentary Triangle i.e. north shore of the lake to Russell then over a new bridge to Parliament House?
  • Given that no-wires is a distinguishing feature of Canberra and the NCA has stated they won’t countenance overhead wires, has this issue been addressed?
  • Has the Commonwealth government agreed to using Commonwealth Ave Bridge?
  • Given that the planned stop near the Mint has no residential population nearby, what population is required to have a stop?
  • Will express buses be cancelled?
  • Will rates go up on either side of the light rail corridor like Northbourne Avenue?
  • Will either side be rezoned to become CZ5

Will suburbs with heritage listings hold pre

29 Jun / 2017

Key Priorities 2017

Issue Problem Perferred Solution
Traffic & Transport
40k zone
Hopetoun Ct And McGregor Street do not provide pedestrian friendly access to the Deakin Shops.
Cars travel down Hopetoun Crt at speed. Pedestrian crossing is particularly difficult for the many elderly residents and families with children.
    Establish a 40km/hr zone on Hopetoun Crt from the Preschool at Stonehaven Cres to Adelaide Ave.
    Add 1 pedestrian crossing across Hopetoun Crt closer to Gawler Crs.
    Another across McGregor St
Adelaide Ave pedestrian crossing
Pedestrian access between Deakin and Yarralumla is dangerous.
Cars travel off Adelaide Ave at speed and often do not stop for pedestrians. This makes the crossing between Deakin and Yarralumla particularly dangerous, especially for children going to Yarralumla Primary and Canberra Girls Grammar.
    Establish raised pedestrian crossings on ramps to Adelaide Ave.
Impact of Light Rail A low benefit cost ratio and further analysis may stop Stage 2. View our PDF for information on submission
Deakin West
Deakin Residential streets are filled with commuter parking.
The introduction of paid parking in West Deakin has compelled commuters working in the area to park in residential streets. This has created parking and amenity issues for local residents.
    Build/allow more parking in other areas around Deakin West.
    Restricting parking hours, and permits.
    Gutter restriction code
    Disallow non-resident all day parking
Bedford St Bedford St Was being used by students at CGGS for all day parking
    Signs have been erected on Bedford St limiting parking to 2 hours.
    Restrictions will require enforcement.
Deakin Shops People park there all day and commute to jobs
    Enforce existing rules
Normanby Crescent Overflow from recent restrictions in Bedford Street
    Potential of more signage
Canberra Girls Grammar School proposal to use LaTrobe Park CGGS has developed a proposal to invest $1 million in building a running track and sports oval in LaTrobe Park. In return, they seek exclusive use of that part of the Park during school hours. Some residents are concerned about a loss of access.
    Ensure appropriate consultation.
    DRA opposed in principle to school privatising a public asset
The playground at LaTrobe Park is old and worn, BBQ does not work and toilet block has been decommissioned Some maintenance of equipment occurs, it is beyond repair and should be replaced. The community playground at Yarralumla is an example. Poor equipment sustains argument that ‘no one is using the park’ And bolsters case for private development
    Replace the playground at LaTrobe Park.
    The new playground could be relocated closer to the Forrest Preschool to maximise its patronage.
    Yarralumla playground provides a good example.
Planning and Construction
Construction of inappropriate buildings Developments and multi-unit buildings are being proposed for Deakin that do not fit within the Deakin environs. Builders construct houses which do not comply with plot ratios and ignore shade constraints. They are aided and abetted by some architects who submit drawings for approval that proffer ‘minor’ breaches of current codes.
    Ensure all planning and construction complies with relevant building codes and the territory plan.
    Ask for a definition of a minor breach.
    Ask for compliance with the Garden City.
Yarralumla Brickworks Further plans for Brickworks will be released.
34 Melbourne Avenue Oversized property exceeds plot ratio. Submission made to approval process.
St Luke’s site Potential change of lease purpose
Details of proposal yet unknown
Purdon partners In discussion
Solander Galleries site
Retirement village with 90 rooms
Managing parking traffic and access. Purdon partners In discussion.
Curtin Shops Supported Curtin Residents Association
NCA Issues Paper – Deakin Forrest Precinct The NCA is seeking feedback on:

    Those characteristics of the neighbourhood valued by the community
    The proposed policy responses to the identified issues
    Whether other matters should be addressed (noting that other provisions of the Plan are also relevant to the precinct)
    Downsizing properties.
    Incentives in budget likely to bring more of these proposals
ISCCC Strategic planning
    Submission by ISC see on NCA Draft DCP Manuka Circle, Canberra Avenue

Annual General Meeting outcome

A well-attended Annual General Meeting of Deakin Residents’ Association, Inc. took place on 29th November 2016 at the Canberra Bridge Club in Deakin.

Guest speaker Mr Andrew Smith, Chief Planner of the National Capital Authority, spoke frankly and interestingly about issues facing the National Capital Authority regarding:

  • “Garden City principles, the City Beautiful, and demands for densification in Inner South Canberra.”
  • “Light rail in the National Capital Area and on main approach roads.”

He took questions and there was a lively discussion on many aspects of the planning issues and on conflicts between development pressures and the existing character of the suburb.

Here is the link to The President’s report to the AGM on activities during the year, and on the outlook for the coming year.

The AGM has elected the following Committee for 2016-17:

  • President: George Wilson
  • Vice-President: Di Johnstone
  • Treasurer: Kate Hambly
  • Secretary: Joel Tu
  • Committee Members:
    • John Bell
    • Mary Baumgarten
    • Helen Allnutt